huffpost Press
Howard Lutnick Hit With Receipts Over Contradictory Data Center Comments
Images
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made a bold statement about artificial intelligence data centers on Wednesday that is not only contradicted by actual data but also by Howard Lutnick himself. During an interview on CNBC, Lutnick discussed the ongoing pushback to the data centers, and insisted that, contrary to popular belief, they don’t actually use massive amounts of water. He also claimed any suggestions that the data centers require lots and lots of water are just “propaganda by our adversaries to try to slow us down.” Lutnick then insisted that data centers are “world-class productions” that could “produce huge economics,” before insisting that communities that recruit data centers will just be better off. But Lutnick’s insistence that data centers don’t use water isn’t supported by the evidence. The Florida Water & Pollution Control Operators Association said a medium-sized data center might need 100 million gallons a year for cooling, while a large one might use 1 to 5 million gallons of water per day during peak conditions. Lutnick’s statement is also contradicted by (checks notes) Howard Lutnick, who, last year, admitted to Fox News’ Sean Hannity that, while he supported building the data centers, “these AI things suck water. They need water.” Here’s a cut of both of Lutnick’s contradictory statements, courtesy of MeidasTouch senior digital editor Acyn Torabi. Lutnick: Data centers don't use water. This is propaganda by our adversaries to try to slow us down.Lutnick last year: These AI things suck water. They need water. pic.twitter.com/CRHkBQ9rka The Trump administration has been promoting data centers, with the president himself declaring on Tuesday that communities that oppose building them will end up “backwards and poor.” However, the push has led to typically conservative ranching and farming communities banding together with left-leaning environmental advocacy groups to voice concerns about the centers. Some fear the centers will negatively affect drought-stricken waterways, cause pollution in food-growing areas and shrink farmland. HuffPost reached out to Lutnick for clarity on his data center water claim, but no one immediately responded. Not surprisingly, people on social media weren’t impressed by Lutnick’s seeming flip-flop, with many noting he also gave contradictory statements about his relationship with disgraced financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Our government is being run by morons. You can quote me on that. https://t.co/6Ysk3Vi67X These are the same people that will tell you the economy is doing well, that they won the war in Iran, and that the Epstein list isn't real https://t.co/T1O5X2Gcpq Receipts are fun! Sort of like when he said he didn’t know Epstein and there were pics of them taking a coastline stroll on pedo island https://t.co/l0LClX8U8t idk about you but i dont trust the guy who lied to us about his close relationship with Epstein https://t.co/kvTYXKX48H Nutlick: "Data centers don't use water!"Google: https://t.co/y6JwZ6iIV6 pic.twitter.com/Ky2dS4ekAc "Data centres don't use water"Fascinating to watch brazen lies about data centres on mainstream tv. From the US commerce secretary.The Trump administration has made a suicidal error by pumping more money, hype & lies into the AI bubble tech. It will burst and destroy them. https://t.co/0a1UqzrlS2 Who would have thought that the guy who lied about Epstein would he terrible PR for the Trump administration? https://t.co/xa2Ek6ZFOT Trump has proven you can lie all you want and no one in the media will bother fact checking, correcting, or asking why you said one thing and are now saying the complete opposite. Naturally, this rule only applies to Republicans. 🙃 https://t.co/4mSfqaowec By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.