This weekend’s escalating tit-for-tat strikes between the U.S. and Iran, which threaten the already fragile agreement to halt hostilities, prompted a scathing rebuke of Donald Trump from The Wall Street Journal’s conservative editorial board on Sunday.

Read the full editorial on The Wall Street Journal.

The publication’s board, which has been a persistent thorn in Trump’s side throughout his second term, questioned the value of the U.S. memorandum of understanding with Iran, writing:

“The best selling point for President Trump’s memorandum of understanding with Iran was that at least it opened the Strait of Hormuz. Well, now the regime is trying to nullify those terms by using force against commercial vessels, Gulf states and U.S. bases. All of this violates the deal and calls into question why Mr. Trump signed it.”

The editorial then flipped one of Trump’s own recent criticisms back on him.

After Trump complained on Saturday following Iranian attacks that it was “very possible” Iran’s leaders “will never learn,” the Journal asked: “Or is it U.S. decision makers who never learn?”

It slammed Vice President JD Vance for appearing to portray Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps leadership as “transformed” and ready to “turn over a new leaf,” calling those currently in power in Tehran “the same terrorist regime, and this is the Battle of Hormuz that Mr. Trump thought he had ducked.”

By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.