Iran sends response to US proposal to end war via mediator Pakistan

According to the proposal, initial negotiations will focus on ending hostilities.

Save

Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near Bandar Abbas, Iran, May 4, 2026. Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near Bandar Abbas, Iran, May 4, 2026. [File: Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA via Reuters]

Iran’s response to a US proposal to end the war has been sent via mediator Pakistan, according to Iranian state news agency IRNA.

The report said on Sunday that according to the proposed plan, the first stage of the negotiations will focus on ending hostilities, as well as ensuring “maritime security” in the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

A Pakistani diplomatic source told our colleagues at Al Jazeera Arabic that the Iranian response has been transferred to the US side by Pakistan.

Washington had sent Iran a 14-point proposal earlier this week. Under its conditions, Iran would have to agree to not develop a nuclear weapon and to stop all uranium enrichment for at least 12 years. It would also be required to hand over an estimated 440kg (970lb) stock of uranium, which it has enriched to 60 percent.

In return, the US would gradually lift sanctions, release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets, and halt its naval blockade of Iranian ports.

The development comes just a week before US President Donald Trump is due to visit China, which is one of the largest importers of Iranian oil and has strategic interests there.

Hormuz blockade and attacks continue despite ‘ceasefire’

The US and Iran have exchanged fire in the Strait of Hormuz over the past week, yet neither country has announced a collapse of the ceasefire in place since April 8.

Trump believes that Iran is “collapsing financially” and losing millions of dollars a day due to Washington’s naval blockade of Iranian ports, which began at 14:00 GMT on April 13.

Advertisement

While the blockade is hurting Iran, analysts said they believe the country has the economic and political will to sustain it.

Iran’s parliamentary speaker and lead negotiator in the ceasefire talks, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said in a statement on Thursday that a full ceasefire could only work if the US naval blockade is lifted.

In response to US actions, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz to all foreign shipping and captured several foreign-flagged ships. Previously, it had allowed some ships deemed “friendly” to Iran to pass.

Stakes ‘very high’

Al Jazeera’s Kamal Hyder in Islamabad said Pakistan confirmed receipt of the Iranian response and is now pushing Iran to “come to a middle ground” in negotiations.

“Details of the proposal from the Iranians are not known. This is sensitive diplomacy,” Hyder said. “Other countries – including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and China – have been in close touch with the Iranians and its foreign minister [about mediation efforts].”

Hyder added there was a sense of urgency to get a deal accepted, as the extended blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is having a critical impact on the world economy, especially in Pakistan.

“The stakes are very high: Pakistan is suffering economically as well. The fuel prices are sky-high,” Hyder said.

“Pakistan has good relations with Iran, and it is in a favourable position with the Trump administration, so the likelihood of some sort of breakthrough is possible. The next few days will be critical and will depend on how favourably the US responds to whatever the Iranian response is.”

Abbas Aslani, a senior research fellow at the Center for Middle East Strategic Studies, added that Iran’s latest answer to the US proposal is not a “yes or no response” but a clarification of Iranian views on the US text.

“If they can reach a kind of peace agreement at the initial stage, that could create a positive atmosphere and a trust-building measure somehow,” Aslani told Al Jazeera.

“But if the US wants to continue its demands, like Iran exporting its highly enriched uranium to the US or suspending enrichment for a long time, I think this could make any agreement impossible.”


Advertisement